Skip to main content

Asset Intelligence Converges with Clinical Security

August 4, 2025
Image: [image credit]

Brandon Amaito, Contributing Editor

Hospitals have spent the past decade connecting everything from infusion pumps to MRI scanners to corporate networks. That connectivity delivered valuable data streams and operational efficiencies, yet it also created a vast, largely invisible attack surface. The decision by Axonius to acquire Cynerio for a reported $100 million signals a pivotal moment: cybersecurity vendors are moving from awareness of the problem to full ownership of the medical-device risk agenda.

Connected Devices: A Growing Blind Spot

ECRI again ranks unsecured connected devices among 2025’s top health-technology hazards, citing vulnerabilities in infusion pumps, wireless monitors, and other clinical IoT endpoints as direct risks to patient safety, not merely data confidentiality. At the same time, the HIPAA Journal calculates more than 700 large U.S. healthcare breaches in 2024 alone, with hacking incidents responsible for the overwhelming majority. Security teams increasingly acknowledge that attackers see no functional distinction between an email server and a CT scanner. Any unmanaged endpoint can provide the beachhead for ransomware, data exfiltration, or intentional disruption of care-critical workflows.

Despite mounting evidence, most hospital budgets still prioritize conventional IT controls. The latest HIMSS Healthcare Cybersecurity Survey found only 8 percent of respondents “highly confident” in their organization’s ability to inventory, and therefore secure, connected medical devices. The resulting visibility gap complicates everything from vulnerability management to incident response, leaving biomedical and security teams debating ownership rather than coordinating action.

Asset Intelligence Meets Clinical Nuance

Axonius built a $2.6 billion valuation on the promise of complete asset intelligence across traditional IT estates, SaaS deployments, and cloud environments. Cynerio’s platform, by contrast, specializes in discovering, profiling, and segmenting medical and IoT devices that operate on proprietary protocols and often lack agent-based instrumentation. Uniting these strengths can deliver a single “source of truth” that spans the entire clinical environment—an outcome many health-system CISOs have demanded for years but struggled to assemble piecemeal.

The strategic logic rests on data gravity. Enterprise IT assets already provide a wealth of contextual information, such as network flows, configuration states, user associations, that enrich risk scoring. Medical devices add another layer: clinical context such as patient proximity, procedure schedules, and potential safety impacts. When these datasets converge, security leaders gain a multidimensional view that supports smarter segmentation, risk-based patching, and automated policy enforcement.

Beyond the Purchase Price: Strategic Motives

Axonius had several options for entering the healthcare vertical, channel partnerships, organic product extensions, or smaller tuck-in acquisitions. Opting for Cynerio suggests a desire not merely to add a feature but to own the conversation around cyber-physical risk. By bringing Cynerio’s clinical-engineering relationships and subject-matter expertise in-house, Axonius accelerates market penetration while also shaping the broader narrative: asset intelligence is inseparable from patient safety.

Financial considerations loom large. Industry analysts estimate that U.S. hospitals will spend nearly $10 billion on IoT-security tools and services by 2028 as ransomware pressure, insurer requirements, and potential civil-money penalties intensify. A combined Axonius-Cynerio entity sits well to capture budget allocated to both IT security and clinical-engineering modernization, reducing competitive friction and expanding average contract value.

Regulatory Pressure Raises the Stakes

The Food and Drug Administration finalized its medical-device cybersecurity pre-market guidance in June 2025, explicitly requiring manufacturers to address threat-mitigation capabilities and software-bill-of-materials transparency. While the regulation applies to vendors, its downstream impact falls squarely on providers, which must prove that legacy devices are patched, segmented, or otherwise risk-managed. Simultaneously, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights continues to emphasize that hospitals bear ultimate responsibility for protecting protected health information, regardless of device class.

Taken together, these regulatory moves transform connected-device security from a “nice-to-have” to a board-level compliance issue. Health-system leadership can no longer treat biomedical security as an operational detail; it now intersects with enterprise risk management, insurance premiums, and even bond covenants linked to cybersecurity posture.

Implications for CISOs and Clinical Engineers

The combined platform’s success will depend on bridging historically siloed teams. Security operations centers excel at network telemetry and threat-hunting but often lack insight into device clinical workflows. Clinical-engineering departments understand the therapeutic significance of each modality yet rarely possess the tooling to articulate cyber risk in enterprise terms. Unifying asset intelligence offers a shared data model that can align priorities such as patch windows, downtime tolerance, and micro-segmentation policies.

Hospitals evaluating the Axonius-Cynerio stack should look for:

  • Granular context that distinguishes, for example, an anesthesia machine actively used in surgery from an identical device in storage.
  • Automated policy enforcement that pushes segmentation or firewall rules directly to infrastructure rather than generating passive reports.
  • Regulatory mapping that ties device attributes to specific FDA requirements and HIPAA safeguard categories, streamlining audit preparation.

What Comes Next for Cyber-Physical Security

The acquisition underscores a broader market trend toward converged cyber-physical security platforms. Similar consolidation can be expected in adjacent domains such as building-automation systems, smart pharmacies, and autonomous transport within hospital campuses. Vendors able to ingest heterogeneous data, apply clinical context, and orchestrate automated controls will define the next generation of healthcare security architecture.

For now, Axonius and Cynerio carry the burden of proof. Integration roadmaps must deliver tangible reductions in mean-time-to-detect, patch latency, and unplanned downtime. Success will be measured not only in vulnerability metrics but also in operating-room turnover rates, medication-dispensing accuracy, and ultimately patient outcomes.

If the platform delivers, the deal will mark more than a $100 million transaction; it will signify the moment asset-centric cybersecurity matured into a patient-safety discipline, an inflection point many in healthcare have argued is overdue.