Skip to main content

Why Data Strategy Now Matters More Than AI Investment

June 19, 2025
Image: [image credit]

Victoria Morain, Contributing Editor

Two weeks after King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh became the first organization globally to achieve Stage 7 on the modernized HIMSS Analytics Maturity Model (AMAM), the message still hasn’t landed in most executive suites: analytics governance is now a competitive differentiator. The question is no longer whether health systems should invest in predictive and prescriptive analytics. It’s whether they can govern those systems, justify their outcomes, and deploy them in ways that deliver real strategic return.

KAMC reached a milestone that most U.S. and European hospitals have yet to approach. It didn’t happen through vendor hype cycles or AI experimentation. It happened because the organization invested early in analytics infrastructure, patient-facing data transparency, and measurable clinical decision support. In doing so, it modeled exactly the kind of enterprise alignment that most systems still treat as aspirational.

And yet, few are taking the hint. A 2024 Kaufman Hall performance report showed that despite rising operational pressure, fewer than 30% of hospitals surveyed had fully integrated enterprise analytics into strategic decision-making. More than half said their analytics investments were fragmented across departments, lacking standardized governance or business case alignment.

This fragmentation is not just a productivity problem. It’s a risk problem.

The adoption of advanced analytics and AI in healthcare is accelerating, but regulation is not standing still. The ONC HTI-1 Final Rule includes provisions that demand greater transparency in clinical decision support algorithms. The FDA, meanwhile, is actively developing a regulatory framework to classify and monitor software as a medical device (SaMD), including AI-based tools that drive diagnostic or therapeutic decisions. And CMS continues to test real-time analytics capabilities as part of its alternative payment model evaluations.

The implication is clear: systems that cannot defend how their algorithms work, like how they are trained, monitored, and applied, will not be ready for reimbursement or compliance environments of the near future.

KAMC’s achievement signals a different path forward. By embedding AI tools into workflows with clinician visibility and human oversight, the organization has shown what it means to scale responsibly. Analytics is not abstract at KAMC. It’s embedded in device integration, patient self-management, and daily operational decision-making. These capabilities are measured, governed, and aligned with enterprise outcomes.

Compare that to most health systems, where analytics projects are still largely relegated to dashboards, retrospective analysis, or vendor-managed data science experiments with limited frontline input. A 2024 Deloitte survey of healthcare leaders found that only 14% of systems had real-time analytics integrated across clinical and operational workflows. Even fewer had a defined governance model to evaluate performance or mitigate bias.

This lack of structure threatens not only adoption, but credibility. If clinicians cannot trust the system, they won’t use it. If patients don’t understand how AI is used in their care, trust erodes. And if executives cannot prove that AI enhances value, investors and regulators will push back.

This is why HIMSS’ decision to modernize the AMAM framework matters. Stage 7 under the new model is no longer about data volume or tool availability. It’s about the governance, cultural maturity, and organizational readiness to use analytics not just effectively, but responsibly.

Health systems that want to remain competitive in a rapidly consolidating and value-driven environment must treat data as infrastructure. That means centralizing analytics strategy, aligning investments with real clinical and operational KPIs, and embedding governance into deployment. It also means elevating new leaders: chief analytics officers, data ethics teams, and patient trust councils that can monitor and refine AI performance in the real world.

There’s no silver bullet, but the direction is clear. The systems that lead tomorrow will not just have the best models. They’ll have the best governance, and the organizational muscle to use analytics as a source of truth, strategy, and trust.